INTEL_REPORT
arXiv — Cryptography & Security (cs.CR) · published 7/3/2026, 4:00:00 AM · TLP amber
Summary
Ingested excerpt (first ~500 chars of normalized text).
Has This Checkpoint Been Abliterated? A Two-Signal Audit and Its Failure Map arXiv:2607.01854v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Can a platform tell, before deployment, whether an open-weight checkpoint has had its refusal mechanism stripped? Runtime guards cannot: they score generations, not the artifact. We combine two cheap internal signals, a reference-anchored activation refusal-gap and a weight-recovery energy of the base-to-candidate weight difference, into a threshold-fr…
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.01854
sha256:08f3bc3ff7e5fd11b45608714867ddaef7cbf80e06f9bdbc1cad8b85fc8e97a5
What we pulled out
Deterministic extractor (IOC + allowlisted tokens + ATT&CK IDs present in DB).
Indicators
Linked with report → mentions → indicator. Values open the indicator workspace.
No indicators linked for this report.
Malware families
Allowlist token matches only.
Threat actors mentioned
Allowlist mentions — not a formal attribution verdict.
ATT&CK techniques
MITRE IDs referenced in text and present in local technique table.
CONTINUE INVESTIGATION
High-signal pivots without leaving the thread you started in search.
Browse the report corpus.